This is the basic dimensions page, but there is more on dimensions.

I'm going to derive the basic dimensions of Lego bricks by observation and reasoning, trying to think like the Lego engineers did when they designed the system. I will also define my idea of the difference between the design dimensions and the production dimensions.

Caveat: like anything I write about Lego, there is no guarantee that the Lego engineers actually reasoned in the way I outline here.

Lego bricks are entirely metric. That means the design dimensions are round numbers when measured in the metric system.

I am going to show this by reasoning on simple structures made with basic bricks, and also by using a standard 48×48 base plate.

At first approach there are two basic numbers.

- the horizontal pitch is 8mm; it is the distance between knobs.
- the vertical pitch is 9.6mm; it is the height of a basic brick.

Do we know those are correct values? Yes, because they hold over large distances. In principle we could measure the distance between knobs by measuring from an edge of one knob to the same edge of the next one, as shown by the two horizontal blue lines:

That is very difficult to do if we want a good value, it is much more accurate to measure between knobs that are far apart and then divide by the number of knobs.

I took a 48×48 knob base plate, put two bricks on it as in the image, and measured 295.75mm ±0.25mm (the metal strip meter is divided with 0.5mm marks) for 37 horizontal steps^{( 1 , 2 )}.

That gives 7.993mm ±0.007mm or 8mm to within better than one hundredth of a mm.

If you are tempted to measure over a distance wider than a base plate, you might think of putting several together, but in that case do not forget there is a gap necessary of 0.2mm (see below why) and so you must therefore link the plates by bricks so the distances between plates is rigourously kept:

For measuring the vertical pitch we can make a tower of, say, twenty bricks high, measure the height and divide by 20 to get a good value for the vertical pitch.

I measured 192.0mm ±0.25mm so that is 9.6mm ±0.013mm. Be sure to line up the meter correctly at one end and to look vertically down at the other end to avoid parallax errors (e.g. the angle of the photo might lead you to think I should have measured slightly less than 192mm).

Note these important aspects:

- The basic pitches and most other measurement numbers are even. That choice ensures it is easy to divide by two.
- 9.6mm does not seem to be a "round number".
- The vertical and horizontal pitches are not equal.

There is an underlying smaller pitch: 0.8mm. That goes 10 times in the horizontal pitch and 12 times in the vertical pitch.

The design dimensions of the classic brick with two rows of four knobs are then 16mm×32mm×9.6mm. It seems that making the brick only 8mm high did not look nice, it's too "flat", whereas making it 12mm high (one and a half times the pitch) looks too "thick".

The value of 9.6mm is also supported by the Technics bracing methods:

9.6×5=8×6=48 and this bracing method also holds over large distances.

Therefore there is no doubt that the basic pitches have exact design values of 8mm and 9.6mm.

(1) It is important to measure from the right hand side of the brick at the left to the right hand side of the brick at the right and not between the bricks, since it is not guaranteed that bricks have a width exactly equal to the horizontal pitch. And in fact they don't: they are 0.2mm less wide.

(2) The measurement should be done at room temperature, as the expansion coefficient of the plastic and the strip meter are not the same. Stainless steel is produced in several varieties, with expansion coefficients ranging from 9.9 to 17.3×10^{-6}/K at 20ºC (possibly the smaller value for stainless steel used in measuring instruments). For the plastic acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) of which Lego bricks are made it is 73.8×10^{-6}/K so at least 4.3 times more than for the ruler, but still quite negligible. A normal base plate is about 380mm wide and by warming up from 15ºC to 25ºC it would expand by less than 0.3mm.

Making the real bricks exact multiples of 8mm long has an unfortunate side effect: the faces of adjacent bricks touch. That is not a good idea unless you are never going to move them again. To avoid the faces rubbing against each other while building or dismantling, a small gap is introduced. I am much less adamant about the exact value of this gap than I am about the value of the basic pitches, but my measurements have consistently turned up the value of 0.1mm play on each side.^{( 1 )}

Leaving 0.1mm on each side then makes the basic 2x4 brick 32mm-0.1mm-0.1mm = 31.8mm long and 16mm-0.1mm-0.1mm = 15.8mm wide and 9.6mm high. When a brick is measured, the play on each side is subtracted and the brick thus seems shorter by twice this play: 0.2mm less than would be expected.

Carefully note that there is now a gap of 0.2mm (twice the play) between adjacent bricks horizontally:

You can also use a set of gap/thickness blades like these:

Note also carefully (and think about it hard if necessary!) that these actual dimensions of a brick do not allow them to be put horizontally in other places than exact multiples of 8mm!

The 31.8mm brick is definitely not a uniformly scaled down version of the "ideal" 32mm brick! It is really a 32mm brick from which 0.1mm has been shaved off on all vertical sides to ensure a reasonable gap.

There is no need for play in the vertical dimension, indeed it is not desirable at all.

(1) Measuring the lengths of 1×n bricks was an interesting endeavour as it turned out that the longer the brick the more play there seemed to be! This is probably due to the fabrication process: as bricks are injection-moulded relatively hot, they contract on cooling down. Longer bricks will contract relatively more than shorter ones. I measured a large number of bricks of lengths 1,2,3,4,6 and 8 knobs. The average double play (gap) is shown by the red crosses and the blue trend line in the graph below:

The dotted green horizontal line is my hypothesis of a gap of 0.2mm. The graph shows that this hypothesis holds well around sizes 3 to 4 knobs, which is what most bricks are.

When one thinks of building something, one usually starts with very simple and rough ideas. When the time comes to make the thing from physical stuff, one usually runs into a few minor problems: a bolt may be in a place where it is difficult to put a nut on, a piece of wood may be too thin for the job. These minor problems are easily solved, and if the contraption happens to be so useful that it can maybe be turned into a sellable product, then perhaps a complete re-think is necessary to make production and/or usage easy.

Toys do not escape this evolution. If you have to explain the building of a model house with classic Lego bricks to someone who has never seen a piece of Lego, you may talk about rectangular plastic blocks with knobs that fit tightly into holes at the bottom of bricks you put on top. You may also usefully mention that they are 32mm by 16mm by 9.6mm.

But as we saw, actual Lego bricks are much more sophisticated than this first approximation. There must be a slight gap between adjacent bricks or it would be very hard to put them in a line (and you would soon scratch the sides too); the knobs must be very slightly larger than the holes they fit in or they would not stick sufficiently well; the plastic must give a little but not too much, and so on.

We may therefore describe the Lego bricks in terms of their intended or design dimensions, which are different from their actual or production dimensions.

The design dimensions of the basic brick are 16mm×32mm×9.6mm but the actual bricks are produced as 15.8mm×31.8mm×9.6mm. To think about bricks and models built with them you should use the design dimensions or you will go crazy. To produce bricks (which you will be unlikely to do unless you have an extremely good 3D printer) you should heed the reasons for the production dimensions.

In all other pages I will mention brick sizes in the design dimensions and not the actual production dimensions. The slight differences always have to do with achieving sufficient play or sufficient friction, but never with positioning the bricks with respect to each other.

Positions of bricks are almost always constrained by having to fit to an imaginary grid with spacing of 8mm horizontally and 9.6mm vertically. To my knowledge that constraint can only be circumvented in two ways:

- the use of special bricks produced by Lego (e.g. with knobs "in between")
- the use of rods or axles and connectors sliding over them with friction

The grid constraint is a severe one for some constructions and it is at the origin of many ingenious applications of connectors. The difference between the 8mm horizontal pitch and the 9.6mm vertical pitch is also at times frustrating when building technical structures.

Finally, don't forget there is more about Lego brick dimensions.